| Progress and Sustainability | ||||||
| Cluster | Quality Criteria | Rank1 (Factor 3) | Rank2 (Factor 2) | Rank3 (Factor 1) | Summary | Cluster Summary |
| Evaluation | Monitoring and evaluation informs strategic direction and both policy and practice | 1 | 1 | 5 | 25 | |
| Evaluation and review (quality) are prioritised and internalized – seen as a core activity and not just an add-on | 2 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Means of measuring must be appropriate in context of the learning region | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | ||
| Results and findings of monitoring, evaluation and review must be able to be widely understood | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Willingness and Capacity of understanding and accepting results | Flexibility of partners to share information (not defensive) | 1 | 1 | 5 | 23 | |
| Flexibility and openness of partners to accept results (failures as well as successes) and act on results | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Outcomes and impact are regularly checked, demonstrated and communicated to all members of the network and the community at large | 1 | 3 | 5 | |||
| Unintended as well as planned outcomes are documented and shared | 1 | 1 | ||||
| The capacity to continuously understand results, reasons; and the capacity to use this understanding to influence ongoing planning | 2 | 1 | 8 | |||