| |
European relevance of criteria and indicators - progress
Page history
last edited
by Randolph Preisinger-Kleine 13 years, 3 months ago
| Progress and Sustainability |
|
| Cluster |
Quality Criteria |
Rank1 (Factor 3) |
Rank2 (Factor 2) |
Rank3 (Factor 1) |
Summary |
Cluster Summary |
| Evaluation |
Monitoring and evaluation informs strategic direction and both policy and practice |
1 |
1 |
|
5 |
25 |
| Evaluation and review (quality) are prioritised and internalized – seen as a core activity and not just an add-on |
2 |
1 |
|
8 |
| Means of measuring must be appropriate in context of the learning region |
1 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
| Results and findings of monitoring, evaluation and review must be able to be widely understood |
|
2 |
1 |
5 |
| Willingness and Capacity of understanding and accepting results |
Flexibility of partners to share information (not defensive) |
1 |
1 |
|
5 |
23 |
| Flexibility and openness of partners to accept results (failures as well as successes) and act on results |
1 |
|
1 |
4 |
| Outcomes and impact are regularly checked, demonstrated and communicated to all members of the network and the community at large |
|
1 |
3 |
5 |
| Unintended as well as planned outcomes are documented and shared |
|
|
1 |
1 |
| The capacity to continuously understand results, reasons; and the capacity to use this understanding to influence ongoing planning |
2 |
1 |
|
8 |
European relevance of criteria and indicators - progress
|
|
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
|
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.