CORE QUALITY CRITERIA: PARTICIPATION IN PARTNERSHIP
|
QUALITY INDICATORS (CORE AND ADDITIONAL/DESCRIPTORS)
What might indicate quality in the partnership?
|
EXAMPLES OF GOOD PRACTICE
Cases from ROMANIA
|
Relevant key stakeholders are actively engaged in the partnership/network
Definition:
A stakeholder is any person or organization, who can be positively or negatively impacted by, or cause an impact on the actions of the partnership / network.
Types of stakeholders are:
- Primary stakeholders : are those ultimately affected, either positively or negatively by the network's actions.
- Secondary stakeholders : are the ‘intermediaries’, that is, persons or organizations who are indirectly affected by the network's actions.
- Key stakeholders : (who can also belong to the first two groups) have significant influence upon or importance within the network.
|
Stakeholders of public and private organisations - including civil society organisations and social partners - are represented in the partnership/network.
Stakeholders are engaged in the partnership with relevant roles and tasks.
Stakeholders assume responsibilities assigned and have initiatives within the partnership/network
|
Collaborative online space for partnership development - North West Regional Development Agency
http://www.nord-vest.ro
Due to the fact that face to face meetings are difficult to be organized when large partnerships are involved, the North West Regional Development Agency invested in a collaborative online platform complementing the classical communication and cooperation channels including conferences and video-conferences, workshops, thematic seminars, working group meetings etc. The platform included both the stakeholders in the Agency Consortium Partnerships but also wider public, as an effective way of increasing transparency and communication with beneficiaries.
Modern systems for e-governance
http://www.cnrd.ro/c-CNRD/cnrd
Another best pracice that has a positive influence on introducing modern communication and collaboration areas could be found in the egovernance solutions proposed by the National Center ”Digital Romania” aiming at increasing the citizen access to public services and developing the capacity of different organisations in the area of decreasing the digital gap. One of the relevant area is the management of electronic single contact point.
www.primariaclujnapoca.ro/userfiles/files/comunicat%20oct.pdf
Another recent example in this area is offered also by the Cluj Napoca City Hall, currently developing an online collaborative platform to be used also for assisting current learning city partnerships.
|
Involves the wider public or community
|
Strategy, approach and methods to reaching out and involve different target groups are in place
Means of feedback and interactive communication are in place and accessible to different target groups
|
Regional Development Plans – www.ismb.edu.ro
The highest challenge is to reach the disadvantaged groups, targeted by the majority of learning regions/cities partnerships. Lacking representation skills, ICT skills and with a low use of media, people were consulted by the means of household surveys, gathering important data for the decisions of the partnership. Moreover, additional statistical data relevant for the learning region activities was collected with the assistance of county statistical offices (i.e. household budget surveys). The Regional Development Plans are currently offering a c detailed view on some of the most important characteristics of excluded groups, creating the opportunity to develop appropriate inclusion measures.
|
Network is known and understood by general public
|
Promotional activities are defined, conducted and followed up on a regular basis
Dissemination plan in accordance with different audiences' needs
Initiatives make their way into the popular media
In order to render transparent the network,
- · formal commitments made through agreements of collaboration and
- ·
|
See point above
|
Besides key stakeholders, primary and secondary stakeholdershave a chance to express their needs, are involved in decision-making (governance) and review of network interventions
|
Feedback mechanisms are in place, which allow for
- · the expression of needs of persons or organizations, who are directly or indirectly affected by the partnership / network's actions,
- · review of network interventions in the light of primary and secondary stakeholder experience
Governance principles and methods are established, ensuring that primary and secondary stakeholders' voice is heard
|
PREZENT! Information caravans and job fairs
www.invatapentrutine.ro
A public awareness campaign was designed for all major regions of Romania. Information caravans and participation to jb fairs proved to be the most effective way of collecting the feed-back and identifying the needs of persons or organisations who are direcdtly of indirectly affecdted by the partnership. Also the caravans offered the opportunity to review specific interventions.
CRBI – Institutional Development of Regional Consortium Bucharest Ilfov
www.adrbi.ro
The communication channels among partners included publication of regular reports stating the progress of the project basesd on monitoring results. All these materials had a feed-back form attached so each organisation could indicate areas of interest or to raise particular questions in relation with a theme. At the end of the project, the partnership published a detailed report summing up all the main messages for the network and form the community at large.
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.